A smoothly functioning economy that increases competitiveness, provides for a strong investment ecosystem, job creation and high standards of living is what all Member States aim for. Getting there is where the real challenge kicks in. In the aftermath of the financial crisis and as a result of non or delayed implementation of structural reforms, a number of Member States, regions and cities are struggling with high unemployment rates and no or marginal economic growth. They still have hurdles to take when it comes to getting the right speed in creating growth and jobs.
In that context the European Commission came with a proposal for a unique new Structural Reform Support Programme for the period 2017 to 2020, which has now also been adopted by the European Parliament. It is an extension of the programme that the EU has offered to Greece and Cyprus in supporting the economic adjustments in these countries that were heavily hit by the financial crisis. This new EU wide support programme will support Member States with the structural reforms needed to boost growth and jobs.
The budget of the programme is set at 142.8 million Euro and is taken from the budget for the European Structural and Investment Funds. It is partly for that reason that the co-rapporteurs from the European Parliament, Lambert van Nistelrooij (EPP) and Constanze Krehl (S&D), decided to integrate core principles of cohesion policy, like the partnerships principle, into the new programme.
The Cohesion funds already contribute to around three-fourth of the Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs). The new SRSP instrument has a broader scope and also touches the fiscal sector and other related legal questions. This programme is not a standalone programme, but a welcome instrument that connects to existing support coming from European Structural and Investment Funds. It does not only implement CSRs but also enlarges the effects of existing funds. It thereby contributes to developing the EU at a higher gear.
The support can take the form of many different actions and activities, for example facilitating the exchange of expertise and good practices between Member States.
Take the Netherlands for example, one of the country specific recommendations prescribes a need to tackle barriers to hiring employees on a permanent contract basis in order to facilitate the transition from temporary employment contracts to permanent contracts. In order to achieve that, the Netherlands could request the Structural Reform Support Service, which is executing this programme, to arrange an expert from another EU Member State which has already achieved that transition. This example shows that also for a well-performing country like the Netherlands this programme could be beneficial.
With the introduction of this instrument we find a better balance between the carrot and the stick: we should not only punish Member States when they do not achieve targets set under the Stability and Growth Pact, but also support them in bringing about the required reforms. A positive step forward!